I read with profound worry the proposed name change for the current Division of Mathematical Sciences. I was under the impression that all branches of mathematical research were equal, but this proposed name change has a whiff of an Orwellian ``but some branches are more equal than others''.
The new name will change the social perception (read Congress' perception) of the purpose of this division of the NSF. The practical effect of this will be an ``equitable'' partition of resources between Mathematical Sciences and Statistics with damaging consequences to the mathematical community and research.
If anybody doubts of the plausibility of this scenario I would point him or her to the recent troubling events from UK. In that case, the ``equitable'' partition of resources took the form of a skewed allocation of postdoctoral positions, with a complete bias towards statistics. This prompted a public reaction from the British mathematical community that took the form of an open letter to the Prime Minister( for details see this recent article from The Guardian)
The fact that the British mathematical community had a public reaction is a telling fact in itself because we mathematicians tend to no get involved, even when our interests are at stake. I think that the American Mathematical Society ought to state clearly and publicly its position on this issue and I sincerely hope that the AMS will oppose such a name change.
No comments:
Post a Comment